AudiogramIQ

Context

Occupational hearing-conservation programmes depend on repeated audiograms, baseline comparisons, follow-up rules, and reports that can still be reviewed after the examination day. When those steps live in separate files, the clinician spends time rebuilding the evidence before deciding what it means.

Problem

Raw thresholds are not the end of the workflow. The reviewer needs to see the audiogram, understand which baseline was used, identify meaningful changes, and keep the underlying values available when an automated interpretation needs to be checked.

Suttisak’s role

Suttisak defined the clinical workflow, product scope, interpretation requirements, interface direction, and full-stack implementation. The work joins occupational-medicine knowledge with software design rather than translating a finished specification from another team.

What was built

• Audiogram entry and visualisation.
• Consistent interpretation of hearing thresholds.
• Baseline comparison and review of possible Standard Threshold Shift findings.
• Structured summaries and Excel exports for programme teams.
• A clear introduction to the hearing-conservation workflow.

Key workflow

1. Record or import the hearing thresholds.
2. Select and verify the relevant baseline.
3. Review the plotted audiogram and generated interpretation.
4. Inspect possible threshold-shift findings with the source values still visible.
5. Prepare a structured result or export for the wider hearing-conservation process.

Constraints

Clinical review must remain possible at every step. Automated analysis supports judgement; it does not replace it. Source values, baseline choices, and the reasoning behind a finding must remain easy to inspect.

Outcome

AudiogramIQ provides one repeatable path from threshold data to a reviewable occupational-health result, making the logic easier to inspect, explain, and carry into the wider hearing-conservation process.